Florida Gulf Coast
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
581  Lauren Tarovisky SR 21:02
1,069  Morgan Reichert SR 21:40
1,233  Courtney Corradetti SR 21:51
1,273  Anita Munoz SR 21:54
1,437  Araceli Leon SO 22:05
1,462  Regan Farrow JR 22:06
1,515  Stephanie Cajas JR 22:10
1,642  Carley Lutzow FR 22:19
National Rank #178 of 339
South Region Rank #22 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.3%
Top 20 in Regional 89.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren Tarovisky Morgan Reichert Courtney Corradetti Anita Munoz Araceli Leon Regan Farrow Stephanie Cajas Carley Lutzow
Upstate Invitational 10/03 1243 21:48 21:42 21:55 21:55 22:23 22:11 22:32 22:11
South Florida Invitational 10/16 1207 21:03 21:35 22:08 22:03 21:50 21:54 21:52
ASUN Championships 10/30 1202 20:57 21:49 21:36 21:54 22:24 22:13 22:14 22:26
South Region Championships 11/13 1171 20:45 21:36 21:51 21:43 21:50 22:08 22:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 525 0.0 0.3 1.3 3.1 4.8 7.0 9.3 11.0 14.5 16.6 12.7 9.3 5.3 2.8 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Tarovisky 61.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1
Morgan Reichert 102.5
Courtney Corradetti 115.8
Anita Munoz 118.3
Araceli Leon 133.9
Regan Farrow 136.8
Stephanie Cajas 142.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 1.3% 1.3 11
12 3.1% 3.1 12
13 4.8% 4.8 13
14 7.0% 7.0 14
15 9.3% 9.3 15
16 11.0% 11.0 16
17 14.5% 14.5 17
18 16.6% 16.6 18
19 12.7% 12.7 19
20 9.3% 9.3 20
21 5.3% 5.3 21
22 2.8% 2.8 22
23 1.1% 1.1 23
24 0.6% 0.6 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0